As the regular season draws to a close, the MLB playoff picture has nearly crystallized. I thought it would be fun to look back at my early April post simply titled “Predictions sure to go wrong”. In that post, I prognosticated the winners and losers in each division and gave my 2 cents on each team. Today, I’ll paste that original post and add where I was right – and where I was WAY wrong.
AL East:
My Original Prediction:
Yankees 92-70
Rays 85-77
Red Sox 83-79
Blue Jays 82-80
Orioles 65-97
Comments: This is a fairly stacked division.
Where I was right:
The Yankees being a 90+ game winner (I nearly nailed their record!), Tamp Bay being a tough contender (I sold them short on wins) and the Blue Jays trending up (they were unit Bautista went down with an injury)
Where I was wrong:
I missed badly on Baltimore . When you look at their run differential and their record in 1 run games, it’s easy to say that a lot of the O’s success is due to sheer luck – but the fact remains that they’ve won the these games. They’re certainly not the bottom feeder I thought they would be.
Speaking of bottom feeders;
Al Central
My Original Prediction:
Tigers 88-74
Twins 86-76
Indians 81-81
Royals 70-92
White Sox 66-96
Comments: I'm of the firm belief that
Where I was right:
I also predicted the KC mediocrity almost to a ‘T’. They were a popular dark horse pick to contend, but the Royals just didn’t seem ready.
Where I was wrong:
I was overly confident with the Twins. I assumed the starting pitching would simply be league average and that would allow the Twins to hang around. In my defense, had the starting pitching been average or even slightly below average, the Twins WOULD be hanging around the division. But, the pitching was horrid and the Twins are bottom feeders. Missed them by a large margin this year.
Same goes for Cleveland . I liked their lineup and saw them being a tougher team than most did. I thought at the very least they were a .500 ballclub. In reality, they’re just as bad as Minnesota .
Finally, a brief hat tip to the White Sox. I had them pegged as being utterly atrocious this year and instead they hung around the division until the final three games (leading most of the way). I didn’t see this team as a contender – but they certainly could be listed as one of the better teams in the AL .
Al West
My Original Prediction:
Rangers 90-72
Angels 85-77
A's 70-92
Mariners 64-98
Comments: No, signing Albert Pujols doesn't instantly make the Angels my World Series pick - in fact with the depth of the AL and a very, very good Rangers team in front of them (two AL pennants in two years is not an accident) I think they'll barely scrape into the playoffs (Tiebreaker with Tampa Bay). The A's and Mariners are also rans. This is a top heavy division that will be very entertaining throughout the year.
Where I was right:
The Rangers are good – I don’t really give myself credit for hitting that one. But, it still counts as being right.
The Angels didn’t instantly win the division, in fact, they didn’t even make the playoffs (missed the playoff part – so I was 1 for 2 on the other LA team)
I sold the Mariners short on wins, but I nailed their general season “also rans”.
Where I was wrong:
NL East
My Original Prediction:
Phillies 90-72
Marlins 88-74
Nationals 81-81
Braves 78-84
Mets 70-92
Comments: I think the Phillies played a little over their heads last year. They are still the best team in the NL East, (and probably all of the NL) but I don't think they're head and shoulders above the rest of their improved division. I like what the Marlins did this off season and I think they'll be just good enough to keep things interesting if not steal a wild card come October. The Nationals are a very good young team that is not quite ready for the playoffs - but look out for them in 2013. I feel like the Braves overplayed their record last year and will fall back slightly due to a tougher division. The Mets are still rebuilding and don't even look good on paper. In hindsight, I feel like 70 wins was being overly generous...
Where I was right:
Phillies 90-72
Marlins 88-74
Nationals 81-81
Braves 78-84
Mets 70-92
Comments: I think the Phillies played a little over their heads last year. They are still the best team in the NL East, (and probably all of the NL) but I don't think they're head and shoulders above the rest of their improved division. I like what the Marlins did this off season and I think they'll be just good enough to keep things interesting if not steal a wild card come October. The Nationals are a very good young team that is not quite ready for the playoffs - but look out for them in 2013. I feel like the Braves overplayed their record last year and will fall back slightly due to a tougher division. The Mets are still rebuilding and don't even look good on paper. In hindsight, I feel like 70 wins was being overly generous...
Where I was right:
Nowhere! I missed on every team. I kick myself because I originally had
Oh, I suppose I was spot on with the Mets winning around 70 games – but that feels like a hollow victory.
Where I was wrong:
Everywhere! The Marlins offseason moves turned to dust, the Braves are playoff bound and look good, the Phililes are far from one of the best teams in the NL and the Nationals are good enough to win now.
NL Central:
My Original Prediction:
Reds: 90-72
Cardinals: 81-81
Pirates: 78-84
Brewers: 70-92
Cubs: 68-94
Astros: 50-112
Comments: The Reds are the best team in a bad division. As such, I look for them to run away and hide with the division lead pretty early on. The Cardinals cannot overcome the loss of Pujols and flounder at .500 for the year. Likewise, the Brewers are missing a key piece without Fielder and shrink back without his bat. The Cubs are in year one of a likely 3 year rebuilding plan and will likely be out of the race by June.
Where I was right:
The Reds are the best team in a bad division (nailed it!)
The Cubs are out of contention by June (nailed it!)
The Brewers miss Fielders bat and shrink back (low-balled the wins, but the premise is correct)
The Astros are a bad team (nailed it!)
The Pirates were close to .500, but not quite there (nailed it!)
The Pirates were close to .500, but not quite there (nailed it!)
Where I was wrong:
I did not think the Cardinals could recover without their long time manager and best player. They’ve struggled this season like I thought they might, but they’ve put together enough wins to be on the cusp of a playoff birth.
NL West
NL West
My Original Prediction:
Dodgers 86-76
Giants 85-77
Diamondbacks 82-80
Rockies 75-87
Padres 70-92
Comments: I'm so torn on this division that I could see the
Where I was right:
The West was a competitive division – the Giants did win on great pitching and Buster Posey. The Dodgers have a chance to finish with the exact record I predicted and the Diamondbacks showed that their young team is a threat to contend. The Padres finished with nearly the same number of wins I originally predicted.
Where I was wrong:
The Rockies were a tire fire – not a contending team.
Original Playoff Predictions:
Yankees – East
Tigers – Central
Rangers – West
Wild Card 1 – Angels
Wild Card 2 – Twins
NL:
Phillies – East
Reds – Central
Dodgers – West
Wild Card 1 – Giants
Wild Card 2 – Marlins
Actual Playoff Lineup:
Yankees / Orioles – East
Tigers – Central
Rangers / A’s – West
Wild Card 1 – Yankees / Orioles loser
Wild Card 2 – Rangers / A’s loser
I hit on 3 of the 5 teams. 60% accuracy prior to the season even starting isn’t too bad – right?
NL:
Nationals – East
Reds – Central
Giants – West
Wild Card 1 – Braves
Wild Card 2 – Cardinals / Dodgers
The Dodgers aren’t likely to make the playoffs – so I’m not counting them on my total. That means I hit 2 of the 5. 40% - not as hot. Oh well, can’t win them all.
It just goes to show that the baseball season can go in a lot of unpredictable directions. The teams that win the offseason (Angels, Marlins) aren’t always the shoe-ins that everyone assumes they’ll be.
I’ll review my original playoff predictions at the end of this week and post new / updated predictions once the field is set! Enjoy the last few days of the regular season!
No comments:
Post a Comment